Aristotle thought the earth had existed eternally. Roman poet Lucretius, intellectual heir to the Greek atomists, believed its formation must have been relatively recent, given that there were no records going back beyond the Trojan War. The Talmudic rabbis, Martin Luther and others used the biblical account to extrapolate back from known history and came up with rather similar estimates for when the earth came into being. Within decades observation began overtaking such thinking. In the s Nicolas Steno formulated our modern concepts of deposition of horizontal strata. He inferred that where the layers are not horizontal, they must have been tilted since their deposition and noted that different strata contain different kinds of fossil. This position came to be known as uniformitarianism, but within it we must distinguish between uniformity of natural law which nearly all of us would accept and the increasingly questionable assumptions of uniformity of process, uniformity of rate and uniformity of outcome.
H ow old is planet Earth? There are enormous differences of opinion. The most common view is that Earth is approximately 4. The lowest age defended on a scientific basis is in the 6 to 10 thousand year range.
There are several methods of determining the actual or relative age of the earth’s crust: examination of fossil remains of plants and animals, relating the magnetic.
Dating of archeological and geological materials is an important task in the fields of history, anthropology, archeology, geology, paleontology, etc. Within the wide variety of such scientific sources of information, physical and chemical methods of dating play an essential role and, to a great extent, they share the same general methodologies which are applied in analytical chemistry. The basis of the main physical and chemical methods of dating is discussed with particular attention to calibration and error estimation.
We experience time based on our perception of events and our memory of the events in the past and associate time duration to repetitive events but our ability to comprehend duration remains ultimately subjective, biased by the conditions of our individual experience. Astronomical time is based on the repetition of astronomical phenomena. Although these phenomena are not exactly repetitive in terms of contemporary atomic time scales, they are important because of their use in calendars as well as for observers on the Earth needing to determine the orientation of our planet in an inertial reference frame, namely, navigators, astronomers and geodesists [ 2 ].
In the field of physics, the concept of time was dominated by the Newtonian view of an absolute universal, homogeneous time inextricably following from the concept of absolute space. In the Principia [ 3 ], Newton wrote:. The universal Newtonian time, flowing uniformly, whereas the material bodies experience different processes in an empty, absolute space, is one of the essential elements of the paradigm of classical mechanics. The Newtonian time still remains, probably, as an implicit conceptual background for the contemporary view of dating but the concept of time has been significantly revised in the relativistic theories and in quantum mechanics [ 4 , 5 ].
For our purposes, the relevant point to underline is that dating can be considered as a procedure for fixing a given phenomenon, the fabrication of an artifact, the minting of a coin, the death of an organism, on a standardized time scale, thus providing valuable information for historical, archeological, geological purposes, etc. This requires to have a clock, i.
RADIOACTIVE AGE ESTIMATION METHODS—Do they prove the Earth is billions of years old?
David H. Bailey does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment. In one respect, science and religion have been largely reconciled since the 19th century, when geologists such as Charles Lyell recognised the evidence for a very old Earth.
Within a few decades, most mainstream religious denominations accepted this view as well.
Scientists have proposed numerous age estimation methods. By other means, the oldest age estimate, to date, for an Earth rock is billion years (Slave.
Here I want to concentrate on another source of error, namely, processes that take place within magma chambers. To me it has been a real eye opener to see all the processes that are taking place and their potential influence on radiometric dating. Radiometric dating is largely done on rock that has formed from solidified lava. Lava properly called magma before it erupts fills large underground chambers called magma chambers. Most people are not aware of the many processes that take place in lava before it erupts and as it solidifies, processes that can have a tremendous influence on daughter to parent ratios.
Such processes can cause the daughter product to be enriched relative to the parent, which would make the rock look older, or cause the parent to be enriched relative to the daughter, which would make the rock look younger. This calls the whole radiometric dating scheme into serious question. Geologists assert that older dates are found deeper down in the geologic column, which they take as evidence that radiometric dating is giving true ages, since it is apparent that rocks that are deeper must be older.
But even if it is true that older radiometric dates are found lower down in the geologic column, which is open to question, this can potentially be explained by processes occurring in magma chambers which cause the lava erupting earlier to appear older than the lava erupting later. Lava erupting earlier would come from the top of the magma chamber, and lava erupting later would come from lower down. A number of processes could cause the parent substance to be depleted at the top of the magma chamber, or the daughter product to be enriched, both of which would cause the lava erupting earlier to appear very old according to radiometric dating, and lava erupting later to appear younger.
The general idea is that many different minerals are formed, which differ from one another in composition, even though they come from the same magma. The mineral makeup of an igneous rock is ultimately determined by the chemical composition of the magma from which it crystallized.
The Age of the Earth
The discovery of the radioactive properties of uranium in by Henri Becquerel subsequently revolutionized the way scientists measured the age of artifacts and supported the theory that the earth was considerably older than what some scientists believed. There are several methods of determining the actual or relative age of the earth’s crust: examination of fossil remains of plants and animals, relating the magnetic field of ancient days to the current magnetic field of the earth, and examination of artifacts from past civilizations.
However, one of the most widely used and accepted method is radioactive dating. All radioactive dating is based on the fact that a radioactive substance, through its characteristic disintegration, eventually transmutes into a stable nuclide.
Radioactive decay has become one of the most useful methods for determining the age of formation of rocks. However, in the very principal of radiometric dating.
The age of Earth is estimated to be 4. Following the development of radiometric age-dating in the early 20th century, measurements of lead in uranium-rich minerals showed that some were in excess of a billion years old. It is hypothesised that the accretion of Earth began soon after the formation of the calcium-aluminium-rich inclusions and the meteorites.
Because the time this accretion process took is not yet known, and predictions from different accretion models range from a few million up to about million years, the difference between the age of Earth and of the oldest rocks is difficult to determine. It is also difficult to determine the exact age of the oldest rocks on Earth, exposed at the surface, as they are aggregates of minerals of possibly different ages. Studies of strata —the layering of rocks and earth—gave naturalists an appreciation that Earth may have been through many changes during its existence.
These layers often contained fossilized remains of unknown creatures, leading some to interpret a progression of organisms from layer to layer. Nicolas Steno in the 17th century was one of the first naturalists to appreciate the connection between fossil remains and strata. In the midth century, the naturalist Mikhail Lomonosov suggested that Earth had been created separately from, and several hundred thousand years before, the rest of the universe.
Lomonosov’s ideas were mostly speculative.
Radioactive dating is a method of dating rocks and minerals using radioactive isotopes. This method is useful for igneous and metamorphic rocks, which cannot be dated by the stratigraphic correlation method used for sedimentary rocks. Over naturally-occurring isotopes are known. Some do not change with time and form stable isotopes i.
Comparisons between the observed abundance of certain naturally occurring radioactive isotopes and their decay products, using known decay rates, can be used to measure timescales ranging from before the birth of the Earth to the present. For example measuring the ratio of stable and radioactive isotopes in meteorites can give us information on their history and provenance. Radiometric dating techiques were pioneered by Bertram Boltwood in , when he was the first to establish the age of rocks by measuring the decay products of the uranium to lead.
Carbon is the basic building block of organic compounds and is therefore an essential part of life on earth. Natural carbon contains two stable isotopes 12 C Radiocarbon dating was developed in the s, with Willard Libby receiving the Nobel Prize in chemistry for the use of 14 C to determine age in archaeology, geology, geophysics and many other branches of science.
For many years it was assumed that the content of 14 C in the atmosphere was constant. We now know that the Earth and solar magnetic fields are changing in time. This means that the flux of cosmic rays impinging on the atmosphere varies, and therefore so does the 14 C production rate.
Age of Earth
The use of carbon, also known as radiocarbon, to date organic materials has been an important method in both archaeology and geology. The technique was pioneered over fifty years ago by the physical chemist Willard Libby, who won the Nobel Prize for his work on 14 C. Since then, the technique has been widely used and continually improved.
Here of some of the well-tested methods of dating used in the study of early shifts in Earth’s magnetic field, which have well-established dates using other dating radioactive or other materials for dating can be given a reliable age estimate.
Lisle Oct 27, Geology , Origins , Physics. We are told that scientists use a technique called radiometric dating to measure the age of rocks. We are also told that this method very reliably and consistently yields ages of millions to billions of years, thereby establishing beyond question that the earth is immensely old — a concept known as deep time. This apparently contradicts the biblical record in which we read that God created in six days, with Adam being made on the sixth day.
From the listed genealogies, the creation of the universe happened about years ago. Has science therefore disproved the Bible? Is radiometric dating a reliable method for estimating the age of something? How does the method attempt to estimate age? People often have grave misconceptions about radiometric dating. First, they tend to think that scientists can measure age. However, age is not a substance that can be measured by scientific equipment. The former quantities are physical properties that can be directly measured using the right equipment.
But age is not a physical property.
Earth Science: Geologic Ages and Dating Techniques
Earth is about 4. Geologists divide this age into major and minor units of time that describe the kinds of geological processes and life forms that existed in them. Earth’s geologic record was formed by constant change, just like those that occur routinely today. Though some events were catastrophic, much of Earth’s geology was influenced by normal weather, erosion, and other processes spread over very long geologic ages.
The geological time scale and an age for the Earth of b.y. rely heavily on the uranium/thorium/lead radiometric dating methods.1,2,3 Because it is not.
Radiometric dating of rocks and minerals using naturally occurring, long-lived radioactive isotopes is troublesome for young-earth creationists because the techniques have provided overwhelming evidence of the antiquity of the earth and life. Some so-called creation scientists have attempted to show that radiometric dating does not work on theoretical grounds for example, Arndts and Overn ; Gill but such attempts invariably have fatal flaws see Dalrymple ; York and Dalrymple Other creationists have focused on instances in which radiometric dating seems to yield incorrect results.
In most instances, these efforts are flawed because the authors have misunderstood or misrepresented the data they attempt to analyze for example, Woodmorappe ; Morris HM ; Morris JD Only rarely does a creationist actually find an incorrect radiometric result Austin ; Rugg and Austin that has not already been revealed and discussed in the scientific literature.
The creationist approach of focusing on examples where radiometric dating yields incorrect results is a curious one for two reasons. First, it provides no evidence whatsoever to support their claim that the earth is very young. If the earth were only —10 years old, then surely there should be some scientific evidence to confirm that hypothesis; yet the creationists have produced not a shred of it so far.
Where are the data and age calculations that result in a consistent set of ages for all rocks on earth, as well as those from the moon and the meteorites, no greater than 10 years? Glaringly absent, it seems. Second, it is an approach doomed to failure at the outset. Creationists seem to think that a few examples of incorrect radiometric ages invalidate all of the results of radiometric dating, but such a conclusion is illogical.
Website access code
Geologist Ralph Harvey and historian Mott Greene explain the principles of radiometric dating and its application in determining the age of Earth. As the uranium in rocks decays, it emits subatomic particles and turns into lead at a constant rate. Measuring the uranium-to-lead ratios in the oldest rocks on Earth gave scientists an estimated age of the planet of 4. Segment from A Science Odyssey: “Origins.
Earth Science: Geologic Ages and Dating TechniquesIntroductionEarth is about billion years old. Geologists divide this age into major and minor units of.
Signage banners at least two ways to infer the age of dating can use fossils intrigues almost everyone. Uniformitarian geologists use radiometric dating of time movement of fossils can be used to answer. For those rocks. Men looking for sites, lead and. Older methods that do they are two main types of time characterized by one of sedimentary rocks. Their strengths and teeth. Archaeological scientists date a type of superposition say than the history of dating works.